Friday, November 11, 2016

Y DNA from ancient Near East

In the table below are links to Y-SNP calls for samples from the ancient Near East.
Sample  Region   Culture      Haplogroup
I1632   Armenia  Copper Age   L1a1-M27*                  calls
I1635   Armenia  Kura-Araxes  R1b1a1b-CTS3187            calls
I1293   Iran     Mesolithic   J2a-CTS1085                calls
I1945   Iran     Neolithic    R2a-Y3399                  calls
I1949   Iran     Neolithic    pre-R2-M479                calls
I1671   Iran     Neolithic    G2a1a-FGC602(xG2a1a1)      calls
I1662   Iran     Copper Age   J2a-PF5008(xL581)          calls
I1674   Iran     Copper Age   G1a1b-GG372                calls
I1069   Levant   Natufian     E1b1b1-PF1871(xE1b1b1b1)   calls
I1685   Levant   Natufian     E1b1b-CTS10365             calls
I1690   Levant   Natufian     E1b1b-CTS4345              calls
I1414   Levant   PPNB         E1b1b1b2-CTS11781          calls
I1415   Levant   PPNB         E1b1b1b2a1-Y4974           calls
I1416   Levant   PPNB         CT(xH, I, J, K)            calls
I1707   Levant   PPNB         T1-PF5610(xT1a1, T1a2)     calls
I1710   Levant   PPNB         E1b1b1a1-CTS675            calls
I1727   Levant   PPNB         F(xG, J, LT, K2)           calls
I1700   Levant   PPNC         H2-P96                     calls
I1705   Levant   Bronze Age   J1a2b-Z2324                calls
I1730   Levant   Bronze Age   J2b1-PF7314                calls
 In the table below are links to Y-SNP calls for ancient DNA samples from the Zagros Mountains of Iran.
Sample  Period           Date BC    Haplogroup
AH2     Early Neolithic  8205–7756  J2b-M12*                calls
WC1     Early Neolithic  7455–7082  G2b2a-Z8022             calls
F38     Early Iron Age   971–832    R1b1a1a2a2a-Y:24376846  calls
 In the table below are links to Y-SNP calls for Neolithic samples from central Asia Minor. Kilinc et al. 2016
Sample  Period                 Date BC    Haplogroup
Bon004  Pre-Pottery Neolithic  > 8300     G2a2b2b-F705      calls
Bon001  Pre-Pottery Neolithic  8212–7952  G2a2b2b1a-PF3422  calls
Tep001  Pottery Neolithic      7500–5800  G, J2, or R1b     calls
Tep006  Pottery Neolithic      7500–5800  C1a2-Y10446       calls
Tep003  Pottery Neolithic      7500–5800  G2a2a-PF3159*     calls
SampleGenome CoveragemtDNA CoverageRead Length (Mean)mtDNA HaplogroupGenetic Sex

Wednesday, August 10, 2016

Iron Age mtDNA from Batman region in SE Turkey ( historic Taron ) shows the presence of Indian population

In the proposed study, the mtDNA HVI and HVII region sequences (354 and 217 bp, respectively) of seven ancient samples collected from Cemialo Sırtı (Batman) excavation site in the southeastern of Anatolia were successfully obtained. The mtDNA HPG compositions of these ancient human samples were determined. The mtDNAhaplogroups of seven ancient individuals were assigned as H1z1, M1a, U2b1, H1a, HV, R2 and R6 and PhyloTreemt ( was used for determination of the mtDNA haplogroups. Furthermore the mtDNA HVI - HVII region sequences of seven samples were comparatively analyzed with some modern human populations and various Neolithic populations that were retrieved from databases from Northern Syria (8000 BC), Central Europe (6000-1550 BC)
and Southern Paris (5000-4000 BC), including the Sagalassos population which is an ancient Byzantium population (11th–13th century Common Era (CE)) near from Ağlasun/Burdur in the Southwestern Anatolia. This study is the first study where the questions about the human ancient DNA (aDNA) are addressed in the dedicated ancient DNA laboratory of Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey.

Ancient DNA Isolation and mtDNA Analysis of approximately 2500-year-old Human Teeth and Phalanx Samples from Çemialo/Batman in Southeastern Anatolia by Rehan Yaka

From Ian Logan's GenBank page:






Do this presence of Indian mtDNA means that Indians started to arrive in Taron earlier than was presumed?

However, only in the canton of Taron did the efforts to protect the pagan temples grow into a full-scale, though self-consciously hopeless, insurrection. Most of the rebel force was put up by the Armenian-Indian theocratic principality or, more precisely, a warrior temple association founded by the Indian tribes who migrated to Armenia some two centuries earlier, presumably, during the reign of King Tiridates I (63-88 CE).

Tiridates I had ordered them to settle in this strategically important area and supply his army with trained cavalry and infantry, which they did loyally. By the fourth century these Indians had grown to a population of up to 100,000, and they had already been partially assimilated into the Armenian society:

Armenia’s Conversion to Christianity

Friday, June 12, 2015

Bronze Age Armenian ancient DNA - Allentoft 2015

Bronze Age Armenia uniparental data.
Sample Name Site Culture 14C Date BP cal BC low yDNA mtDNA
RISE396 Kapan LBA 1192 BC 937 BC
RISE397 Kapan LBA 1048 BC 855 BC R1b1a2a2 T1a2
RISE407 Norabak LBA 1115 BC 895 BC
RISE408 Norabak LBA 1209 BC 1009 BC J2b-Z580 I5c
RISE412 Noratus LBA 1193 BC 945 BC
RISE413 Nerquin Getashen MBA 1906 BC 1698 BC R1b-P297 T2c1f
RISE416 Nerquin Getashen MBA 1643 BC 1445 BC E-M84 K1a17a
RISE423 Nerquin Getashen MBA 1402 BC 1211 BC E-M84 T2a

Probable descendants of RISE397_Kapan_LBA_Armenia

Modern distribution of R1b-M269

The tree of R1b Hg
The PCA from Allentoft et al. zoomed

Sunday, April 12, 2015

Why Balcanic theory of Armenian's origin is not working

The probability that Armenians came from Balkans is very low not to say impossible.

Genetic evidence.
* Marc Haber et al. paper shows that Armenian cluster started to form aproximatively at 2500 BC ( between 3000 and 2000 BC ). And there is no any new admixture after 1200 BC. So Armenian language coming after 1200 BC is impossible.
* If Armenians lived/passed in/trough Balkans so they must have some significant number of Balkan specific Y DNA. This is not the case. Yes there are some Balkanic Y DNA but there are in marginal numbers. Also this Balkanic Y DNA can come from various episodes, starting from Neolithic to Middle Ages ( Byzantine period ) [1]
* The most recent Haak et al. study shows that R1b-Z2103 was present in Yamna and there is no need to make big circle around to Black Sea to come to Armenia. There was much shorter route to Armenia from Yamna. A migration of R1b trough Caucasus.

Archaeological evidence.
* There is no any archaeological evidence of people moving from Anatolia to Armenian plateau after 1200 BC. In contrary there is an evidence of people moving from Armenian Plateau to ex-Hittite empire territories. An example are the so called Eastern Mushkis. It is logic because there was a power vacuum in Anatolia after Hittite collapse. This Eastern Mushkis are most probably the related Cappadocians (Mazaca modern name Kayseri)
* The so called Phrygian ceramics enters to Anatolia later at 1000 BC from Western side of Anatolia. So it's highly improbable that Phrygians were the destroyers of Hittite empire. And this new Phrygian ceramics just stopped at the western side of Euphrate.
* There is a very strong archaeological evidence that the most newcomers entered Armenia from the East not the West. There are two main routs from the east. The Kur valley and the Arax valley. Starting 2800 BC Kura-Arax culture started to collapse from a pressure from the Eastern side (Daghestan later they moved by Kur valley). The newcomers bring with them a culture that can be associated with early IE. 
* In contrast to Eastern Armenia The Kur-Arax culture continued to flourish in South Western Armenian Plateau, till 2000 BC. Later on this basis appears Hurrian cities.
* After 2000 BC there is a new wave of influx. This newcomers founded the Trialeti culture that also have a strong IE traits. This culture can be associated with Proto-Armenians. The Trialeti culture then reaches his peak at 1700 BC ( at this period the Armenian language is on the same stage of development as the Mycenean Greek in Greece ) and later evolves to more homogenous Metsamor-Lchashen culture all over the Armenian Highlands. This process of homogenization ends at 1300 BC. Just in accordance with Marc Haber genetic admixture data.

*  The origin of Herodotus claim could be the result of confusion between late Armenised Cappadocians and the real Armenians from Highland. Cappadocians are related to Mushkis. The founder father  Mesech from Mushki tribe founded the city Mazaca (modern Kesarya). In ancient Assyrian sources Phrygians are called Mushkis, and also there was another non-Phrygian tribe who settled in Cappadocia and Taurus that also where called Mushkis. Historians call them Eastern Mushkis. So this confusion of common origin of Phrygians and Armenians could came from the same name attributed to Phrygians and people living East Anatolia who where Armenised in later periods.

Linguistic evidence
* Armenian language has a high number of Akkadian loanwords. This would be impossible if Armenian came after 1200 BC.
* Armenian language also have some loanwords from Hattic, Hittite,  Hurrian and even a few words from Sumerian that can't be explained by the Balkanic theory.
* Armenian is a satem language has a phonetic system that is quite similar to Kartvelian languages.

Summing all this facts We conclude that Armenian branch of IE entered Armenia from the East circa 2800 - 2000 BC. The Balkanic theory is outdated.

[1]  From Y DNA markers that can be associated with Balcans.
  • E-V13 is a Neolithic marker that probably has a Levantine origin and is hardly unprobable that it is related to IE or to the question of Armenian language.
  • The bulk of  I-M438 is I2c* P215+ L596+ L597+ P37.2- P217- L416-
  • Almost half of J-M12 is J2b* M102+ Z574+ M205- M241-
  • R-M417 a majority is positive to Z93, so came from east and not west