Sunday, July 28, 2024

Dragon Stone Burial from Lchashen

Dragon Stone Burial from Lchashen

The G25 coordinates for the Dragon Stone burial from Lchashen are now available (see the comments). The data come from Bobokhyan et al. 2024.

This unique kurgan burial contained the remains of two newborn children and a woman, who is presumed to have been their mother. A dragon stone (vishapakar) was placed above the tomb.

The autosomal DNA of the individuals is similar to that of other populations living in the territory of the modern Armenia during the same period.

The burial is dated to approximately 1550 BCE, corresponding to the Middle Bronze Age.





Saturday, July 20, 2024

The J2 haplogroup has a complex structure.

The J2 haplogroup has a complex structure. For those who want to understand it better here is a tree made by Rozhansky more than 6 years ago. We have already four detailed topics related to each major subbranch. Top four of most popular J2 branches in Armenia.


Other interesting branches are the
  • +Z6049 found in Caucasian hunters. Popular today in Caucasus. A review about one of its subclade.
  • +PF5197 found in India, Iran and Gulf region. Also, in ancient Neolithic Armenia.
  • +M319 Popular in ancient Crete in Minoans. But also, in Eneolithic steppe.
The populations from left to right are Nakh, Balkar, Ossetian, Georgian, Armenian.
Updated in 2024 July


Wednesday, July 17, 2024

J2-Z6065 in the Armenian Highlands

J2-Z6065 in the Armenian Highlands

J2-Z6065 is the third most frequent branch of J2a in Armenia, after M67 and L25. Its initial homeland was almost certainly located in historic Armenia.

At present, the oldest known Z6065 sample comes from the Neolithic site of Masis Blur in Armenia. Notably, this lineage is absent among early Anatolian and European farmers and is rare or missing in ancient Minoan populations, suggesting that Z6065 had a slightly more eastern origin compared to related branches such as M67 and M319, with which it shares a common ancestor.

J2-Z6065 has two major sub-branches:


1. Y13341 / FGC15782

Like many lineages that formed in the Armenian Highlands, Z6065 appears to have expanded during the Chalcolithic period, moving westward into Anatolia. It has been identified at sites such as Ilipinar in Anatolia and Dinkha Tepe in the Urmia basin.

However, its most significant expansion occurred during the Middle Bronze Age (around 4300 years ago).

  • The subclade Z6065 > YP879 was likely associated with the Van–Urmia cultural sphere and expanded alongside it, as well as with the related Karmir Berd culture.
  • This lineage has been identified in the Urartian city of Sardurihinili and in Late Bronze Age Keti (modern Armenia).

Today, YP879 accounts for approximately 2.5% of the Y-DNA among modern Armenians.


2. Y7687

This sub-branch likely followed a broadly similar early trajectory but diverged through different historical processes.

  • The subclade Z43661 is most likely associated with Bronze Age Anatolia, and there is a strong possibility that it represents a Hittite–Luwian–related lineage.
  • Ancient DNA evidence from the Bronze Age site of Ovaören supports this hypothesis.

Today, this branch is well represented in both Turkey and Armenia.

A distinct lineage within this branch, M47, shows a very different geographic distribution, being most prevalent among Gulf Arab and Iranian populations.

  • M47 expanded during the Bronze Age, but also shows evidence of later expansions.
  • The historical context of these expansions remains unclear due to the lack of ancient DNA.
  • One possible hypothesis is that M47 was initially associated with the Kassites, and later became integrated into Iranian and Semitic populations.

Conclusion

Overall, J2-Z6065 appears to be a lineage deeply rooted in the Armenian Highlands, with multiple expansion phases:

  • Chalcolithic dispersals toward Anatolia and adjacent regions
  • Middle Bronze Age expansions tied to local cultural complexes (e.g., Van–Urmia)
  • Later regional developments, especially in Anatolia and the Near East

Further ancient DNA discoveries will be essential to clarify the full historical trajectory of its subclades.