New ancient DNA from Greece.

New ancient DNA from Greece, specifically from the Corinth region and western Greece. The older samples are similar to other samples from Greece and the Balkans, but the Roman-era samples show a shift toward Anatolia, somewhat consistent with Roman imperial events.

One of the Roman-era Corinthians has Y-DNA R1b-L584, consistent with this eastern shift. Another individual from the Roman era had J2-M92, plausibly reflecting Anatolian affiliation as well. Other Y-DNA haplogroups found at these sites are typical of the Balkans: E1b-L618, R1b-PF7562, J2b-L283, T1a2, and G2.

==========

The consensus of our findings (PCA, ADMIXTURE, and qpAdm using the “Most_Proximate” set of sources) shows that the Amvrakia and Tenea individuals can be considered descendants of the LBA and IA populations of the southern Balkans, especially the area of present-day Greece. In addition, the Roman Tenea individuals appear to have an additional minor contribution from the east, represented by BA Levant and Hellenistic Türkiye (Northwest and West, including Halikarnassos) in the “Most_Proximate” qpAdm analysis. Overall, local genetic continuity is suggested from LBA/IA Greece to Archaic, Classical, and Hellenistic Greece, and to a lesser degree to Roman Greece. However, for the latter, the spatial sampling is inadequate to justify such a generalization.

An open thread about Bronze Age Anatolian Y DNA

An open thread about Bronze Age Anatolian Y-DNA

I plan to write a review about the origins of IE Anatolians. As stated earlier in this group, I believe that a definitive solution to this question requires dozens of Bronze Age Y-DNA samples from specific locations in central Anatolia that are neither Greek (Aegean coast), nor Hattic or Kaskian (northern Anatolia), nor areas with a strong Hurrian presence. Before such data become available, I would like to summarize the already available Y-DNA in order to identify patterns. I will not discuss in this thread the steppe markers R1b and I2. Their affiliation with IE migrations is unambiguous. What is more important about them is the route of migration and their possible linguistic affiliation within the IE family. I will discuss them in the review about Anatolian IE.

J1-Z1828* found at Harmanören - Göndürle Höyük, dated to ~2400 BC (Lazaridis et al. 2017).
There is no information about the downstream branch, but the chances are quite high that it belongs to the BY69 branch, which was found in Anatolia in later periods.

J2-Z6065>Y9268>Z43664 from Ovaören, dated to ~2750 BC (Damgaard et al. 2018).
This branch is parallel to P81 found in the Maykop culture.

Another J2-Z6065 was found in Yediay et al. 2024.

2× J2-M67>Z6273 from Kültepe (Kalehöyük), dated around 2500–1200 BC (Damgaard et al. 2018).
This branch may reflect a new post-Neolithic migration; however, its presence in Neolithic Italy (Cardial Ware) raises the possibility that it was already present in Anatolia since the Neolithic period.

Another possible Bronze Age Anatolian lineage is E-791. However, we need to wait for the publication of Yediay et al. 2024 and the raw files for full confirmation of this theory.

Indirect data suggest that J2-L70, and possibly upstream levels, was also a Bronze Age Anatolian lineage that expanded in the LBA–IA, possibly with the Luwians.

I did not include G2-M406 and T1a2a, as there are strong reasons to believe that they were initially associated with the expansion of the Hattic people.

The main visible pattern is that all these haplotypes have clear eastern connections. Another remarkable feature is their absence from a large set of Minoan Y-DNA. This supports the idea that they cannot be connected to Proto-Minoan migration or to the non-IE Hattic people.

To be continued.

An unusual branch of E1b-M123 from ancient Aghitu

An unusual branch of E1b-M123 from ancient Aghitu

An E1b-Z21466 was found in ancient Aghitu from the Hellenistic era. This branch is rare in ancient remains. Only one sample was previously known from the Imperial Roman period, and now another has been found in ancient Armenia.

You may ask why this is important. Well, Z21466 is a parallel branch of E1b-L791 (see the chart), which is also not particularly rich in ancient samples. L791 is important because indirect data suggest that its expansion is related to Bronze Age Anatolia. The presence of samples from the parallel branch may provide a hint about the direction from which L791 came to Anatolia. Even though the common ancestor of L791 and Z21466 is quite old (12,000 years), the limited amount of ancient DNA from these two branches suggests that they had a compact distribution in the past.

Most likely, the common ancestor Z841 is related to the spread of the so-called Central farmers from northern Mesopotamia northward, including historic Armenia, and possibly southward into southern Mesopotamia. Later, L791 expanded in Anatolia during the Bronze Age. Yediay et al. 2024 identified an E1b-Z830 in Bronze Age Anatolia. Most likely, it belongs to the M123 branch. When the files are uploaded, we will know its exact subclade.

Napoleon Bonaparte’s relatives have been tested, and he belonged to the E1b-L791 branch.

Y DNA from Hellenistic era Syunik Aghitu (Skourtanioti et al. 2025) are now uploaded to FTDNA and TheYtree.

Y-DNA from Hellenistic-era Syunik (Aghitu) (Skourtanioti et al. 2025) has now been uploaded to FTDNA and TheYTree. Sixteen Y-DNA samples were detected by TheYTree.

1× E1b-PF6759
1× G1 (low coverage)
1× J2-M92
1× I2-L699>S12195
1× R1b-Y4364
9× R1b-L584
2× undetermined R1b-M269

From this list, the most interesting is I2-L699, which is found for the first time in ancient Armenia. Its presence was expected, given that L699 was present in Yamnaya. With a few exceptions, such as the Sredni Stog enclave in the lower Don Yamnaya, it was a rare lineage from the Early Bronze Age in the Steppe, so it is not surprising that we have not seen much of it in ancient Armenia. This I2 is different from I2a2b. The latter had an important founder effect in the Trialeti–Vanadzor culture and is the main reason for its high frequency in ancient Armenia and Georgia.

This finding shows that dense sampling is needed to identify rare markers. Therefore, carriers of R1b-PF7562 and R1b-Z2110 can still expect to find their haplotypes in ancient Armenia.

According to Hovann Simonian, the haplotype of Andranik Ozanyan, also known as Zoravar Andranik or Andranik Pasha, was I2-L699>S12195>Y6998 (Pic 2). His branch does not directly descend from the Aghitu I2 but shares a common ancestor with it.