Tuesday, October 27, 2020

The Hajji Firuz BA sample dated to 2300 bce was found accidently in Eneolithic layers

 The Hajji Firuz BA sample dated to 2300 bce was found accidently in Eneolithic layers. It was published in Naramsimhan paper about South Asia and was recognised as having a steppe ancestry. Indeed she has and a lot. Offcourse this do not mean that this type was widespread. We simply need more samples.


Target: IRN_Hajji_Firuz_BA

Distance: 2.1202% / 0.02120195

55.8 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara

21.2 IRN_Hajji_Firuz_C

13.2 Anatolia_Tepecik_Ciftlik_N

9.8 RUS_Darkveti-Meshoko_En


This period in that Urmia region is the end of Kur Araxian culture end emergence of new potteries. One is called Urmia ware ( it is equivalent to Karmir Vanq ) which has connection to contemporary sites in South Caucasus. The other one is the Khabur ware from North Mesopotamia.

This paper is in Persian. It has two interesting maps. One of them represents the Middle Bronze Age.




Below is the abstract in English.


Explaining the Middle and Late Bronze Age Cultures of North-Western Iran, Case Study: Urmia Ware and Khabur Pottery

Authors

Rahim velayati 1 saeed mirzaee 2 Hamid khanali 

1 Assistant Professor Department of Archaeology - University of Tehran


Abstract


The 2nd and 1st millennium B.C., have a special attraction for archaeologists due to the advent of widespread commercial relations and urbanization parameters, establishing an initial city-state and then the governments and creation of the empires. The 2nd millennium B.C. is known as the Bronze Age in Iranian archaeological literature. The Bronze Age is beginning from 3000 BC to 1500 B.C., divided into three shorter periods of Early, Middle and Late Bronze Ages. Early Bronze Age is known as Kura Araxes in the northwest of Iran. In the 3rd millennium BC, Kura-Araxes culture included vast part of the Caucasus, North-West, Zagros and Northern Plateau of Iran, the east and south of Anatolia, north of Mesopotamia, and Levant’s areas in the east of Mediterranean which suddenly collapsed due to several factors. Following the collapse of these areas in the late 3rd millennium B.C., the Culture of the painted pottery flourished in the 2nd millennium B.C. After destruction of this culture during later phases (Middle and Late Bronze Age, 2nd millennium B.C.), nomadism expanded comprehensively in northwestern Iran, Transcaucasia and Eastern Anatolia. According to chronology of Middle Bronze Age, there are two distinct types of pottery in this area; Urmia and Khabur styles. The first one found in the Haftvan Tepe VI B. Edwards invented for first time Terminology of “Urmia style” after excavation of Haftvan Tepe VI B, however, he said it was Stronach’s suggestion. According to the archaeological findings, the tradition began at ca. 2200 B.C. and ended at northwestern Iran, eastern Anatolia ca. 1300 B.C.; however, some researchers believed it expanded from the Qazvin plain (Sagzabad Tepe) to the southern Caucasia and near Erzurum in Turkey. Characteristically, Urmia pottery is a painted monochrome or polychrome ware on red or dark orange background. The motifs of this culture are generally geometric subdivided into Van-Urmia, Tazehkand (Karmirbird), Sevan-Uzerlik Tepe, Tray mountain and Sagezabad cultures. The latter form, Khabur, first time suggested by Melvin fowler to introduce the pithos with geometric and striped motif and Opaque colored found from Khabur Plain. It is characteristically buff ware with black or dark brown geometric or animal motifs. The Khabur wares expanded in vast area, from West and Northwest of Iran, Northern Mesopotamia, Syria and south of Anatolia, whereas Mardin region is known as the entrance gate of Khabur wares into Anatolia. This type of pottery has been dated between 1900 and 1600 B.C. in northern Mesopotamia and also between 2106 ± 68 and 1684 ± 58 B.C. by Thermoluminescent method in Dinkhah Tepe (Northwest of Iran). Khabur style was discarded and replaced by Nuzi pottery at the beginning of Late Bronze Age, but the Urmia style continued in the northwest of Iran, the Caucasia and East of Anatolia until the beginning of Iron Age. There is not much difference between Middle and Late Bronze Ages especially in subsistence strategies and the nature of settlements. The only significant difference is the advent and expansion of polychrome technique and new realistic naturalistic animal and human motifs. Some new forms of pottery appeared in Late Bronze Age including thin bowls with vertical bodies, double-angled wares and boot-shaped rhytons. In this article, there is an attempt to study the expansion of Urmia and Khabur Styles, Intra-regional features, and mutual and inter-regional relations during 2nd millennium BC.Conclusions indicate that the Bronze Age cultures, especially Khabur Style is very important due to the expansion of trade during the period, therefore, the cultures of Urmia and Khabur expanded in Caucasia, East of Turkey, North of Iraq, west and northwest of Iran during this period.

We have discussed recently autosomes.


We have discussed recently autosomes. So, let's compare some modern and ancient populations with a very simple tool called vahaduo.

Target: Armenian
Distance: 1.5158% / 0.01515807
60.4 IRN_Hajji_Firuz_C
17.4 Anatolia_Tepecik_Ciftlik_N
14.0 Kura-Araxes_ARM_Talin
7.0 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
1.2 RUS_Darkveti-Meshoko_En

Target: Kurdish
Distance: 1.6204% / 0.01620444
45.8 IRN_Hajji_Firuz_C
25.8 TKM_Gonur1_BA
17.2 Anatolia_Tepecik_Ciftlik_N
11.2 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara


Target: Georgian_Imer
Distance: 2.3262% / 0.02326166
64.4 RUS_Darkveti-Meshoko_En
23.0 Kura-Araxes_ARM_Talin
12.6 Anatolia_Tepecik_Ciftlik_N

Target: Assyrian
Distance: 1.8124% / 0.01812432
77.8 IRN_Hajji_Firuz_C
14.0 Anatolia_Tepecik_Ciftlik_N
7.0 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
1.2 TKM_Gonur1_BA

And now some ancient pops.


Target: ARM_LBA (Etiuni)
Distance: 2.2611% / 0.02261111
36.2 IRN_Hajji_Firuz_C
29.4 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
20.8 Kura-Araxes_ARM_Talin
7.8 Anatolia_Tepecik_Ciftlik_N
5.8 RUS_Darkveti-Meshoko_En

Target: ARM_Lchashen (Etiuni)
Distance: 2.1067% / 0.02106658
46.8 IRN_Hajji_Firuz_C
26.2 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
22.4 Kura-Araxes_ARM_Talin
2.4 Anatolia_Tepecik_Ciftlik_N
2.2 RUS_Darkveti-Meshoko_En

Target: IRN_Hasanlu_IA
Distance: 2.7997% / 0.02799672
58.6 IRN_Hajji_Firuz_C
17.8 TKM_Gonur1_BA
10.0 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
8.6 Anatolia_Tepecik_Ciftlik_N
5.0 Kura-Araxes_ARM_Talin


As one can see despite broad similarities those nations are different. Georgians do prefer Darkveti Meshoko a Caucasian culture. While the main difference between Kurds and Armenians is the strong presence of Central Asian BMAC ancestry among Kurds which is absent among Armenians. In usual ADMIXTURE runs this BMAC ancestry is visible as ASI. And this is the most surprising result of DNA. All talks of massive Iranian ancestry in Armenia are exaggerated!

Now you may say but Armenians have a lot of Iran Hajji Firuz Chl. Well, that is true but this a 7000 Neolithic farmer sample that came from Fertile Crescent from West (modern Iraqi Kurdistan). That is why Armenians and Assyrians have the highest affinity to this type of ancestry.

The mainstream is that Sintashta culture is a Indo Iranian culture.

 The mainstream is that Sintashta culture is a Indo Iranian culture. So why do You think no single Indo Iranian is close to this Sintashta.


Почему по вашему ни один индо иранский народ не близок к предпологаемой прото индо иранской культуре? Ваше мнение.


Rise395 Eurasian Steppes Sintashta (1860 BC)


1. North_Swedish (7.883)

2. Swedish (11.08)

3. Southwest_Finnish (11.46)

4. Norwegian (11.57)

5. Danish (12.70)

6. German_Central (12.88)

7. West_Norwegian (13.15)

8. North_German (13.30)

Tuesday, February 25, 2020

This important paper of Kossian

This important paper of Kossian is now available online. He says what I am advocating many years based on genetic data. 
The Mushk attested in Assyrian texts in Early Iron Age were not migrants from Balkanes but migrants from Armenian Highlands/East Anatolia/ , South Caucasus. Their deep origins must be in Trialeti Vanadzor culture and LBA Transcaucasia (today Lchashen Metsamor is used) . 
From genetic point of view I2c2 must be their haplotype. Also it is possible that R1b L277 and maybe few cases of E-V13 were introduced to Armenia by them in Middle Late Bronze Age via Caucasus. Then later in EIA they expanded toward west Malatya Kharberd regions. Also, some groups affiliated to them moved to Urmia region in NW Iran. 

Friday, November 11, 2016

Y DNA from ancient Near East

In the table below are links to Y-SNP calls for samples from the ancient Near East.
Sample  Region   Culture      Haplogroup
I1632   Armenia  Copper Age   L1a1-M27*                  calls
I1635   Armenia  Kura-Araxes  R1b1a1b-CTS3187            calls
I1293   Iran     Mesolithic   J2a-CTS1085                calls
I1945   Iran     Neolithic    R2a-Y3399                  calls
I1949   Iran     Neolithic    pre-R2-M479                calls
I1671   Iran     Neolithic    G2a1a-FGC602(xG2a1a1)      calls
I1662   Iran     Copper Age   J2a-PF5008(xL581)          calls
I1674   Iran     Copper Age   G1a1b-GG372                calls
I1069   Levant   Natufian     E1b1b1-PF1871(xE1b1b1b1)   calls
I1685   Levant   Natufian     E1b1b-CTS10365             calls
I1690   Levant   Natufian     E1b1b-CTS4345              calls
I1414   Levant   PPNB         E1b1b1b2-CTS11781          calls
I1415   Levant   PPNB         E1b1b1b2a1-Y4974           calls
I1416   Levant   PPNB         CT(xH, I, J, K)            calls
I1707   Levant   PPNB         T1-PF5610(xT1a1, T1a2)     calls
I1710   Levant   PPNB         E1b1b1a1-CTS675            calls
I1727   Levant   PPNB         F(xG, J, LT, K2)           calls
I1700   Levant   PPNC         H2-P96                     calls
I1705   Levant   Bronze Age   J1a2b-Z2324                calls
I1730   Levant   Bronze Age   J2b1-PF7314                calls
---------
 In the table below are links to Y-SNP calls for ancient DNA samples from the Zagros Mountains of Iran.
Sample  Period           Date BC    Haplogroup
AH2     Early Neolithic  8205–7756  J2b-M12*                calls
WC1     Early Neolithic  7455–7082  G2b2a-Z8022             calls
F38     Early Iron Age   971–832    R1b1a1a2a2a-Y:24376846  calls
----
 In the table below are links to Y-SNP calls for Neolithic samples from central Asia Minor. Kilinc et al. 2016
Sample  Period                 Date BC    Haplogroup
Bon004  Pre-Pottery Neolithic  > 8300     G2a2b2b-F705      calls
Bon001  Pre-Pottery Neolithic  8212–7952  G2a2b2b1a-PF3422  calls
Tep001  Pottery Neolithic      7500–5800  G, J2, or R1b     calls
Tep006  Pottery Neolithic      7500–5800  C1a2-Y10446       calls
Tep003  Pottery Neolithic      7500–5800  G2a2a-PF3159*     calls
----
SampleGenome CoveragemtDNA CoverageRead Length (Mean)mtDNA HaplogroupGenetic Sex
Bon0010.166654.60463.208U3XY
Bon0026.6882,379.09069.841K1aXX
Bon0040.243351.23470.703N1a1a1XY
Bon0050.03968.61571.021N1a1a1XX
Tep0010.02366.81280.863K1aXY
Tep0020.721730.83360.814K1a12aXX
Tep0030.694281.96360.849N1b1aXY
Tep0040.473391.60861.473N1a1a1XX
Tep0060.267259.87983.585N1a1a1XY

Wednesday, August 10, 2016

Iron Age mtDNA from Batman region in SE Turkey ( historic Taron ) shows the presence of Indian population

In the proposed study, the mtDNA HVI and HVII region sequences (354 and 217 bp, respectively) of seven ancient samples collected from Cemialo Sırtı (Batman) excavation site in the southeastern of Anatolia were successfully obtained. The mtDNA HPG compositions of these ancient human samples were determined. The mtDNAhaplogroups of seven ancient individuals were assigned as H1z1, M1a, U2b1, H1a, HV, R2 and R6 and PhyloTreemt (http://www.phylotree.org/) was used for determination of the mtDNA haplogroups. Furthermore the mtDNA HVI - HVII region sequences of seven samples were comparatively analyzed with some modern human populations and various Neolithic populations that were retrieved from databases from Northern Syria (8000 BC), Central Europe (6000-1550 BC)
and Southern Paris (5000-4000 BC), including the Sagalassos population which is an ancient Byzantium population (11th–13th century Common Era (CE)) near from Ağlasun/Burdur in the Southwestern Anatolia. This study is the first study where the questions about the human ancient DNA (aDNA) are addressed in the dedicated ancient DNA laboratory of Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey.

Ancient DNA Isolation and mtDNA Analysis of approximately 2500-year-old Human Teeth and Phalanx Samples from Çemialo/Batman in Southeastern Anatolia by Rehan Yaka



From Ian Logan's GenBank page:
Code:
U2b1
EU330890(Thailand)
EU872046(India)
EU872047(India)
HM156687(India)
HM156690(India)
JX462726(India-LHON)

U2b1a
AY714020(India)
KF056258(Tibet)
KF056259(Tibet)
KF056260(Tibet)
Code:
R6
AY714028(India)
JF742197(Nepal)

R6a
AY714019(India)
HM156672(India)

R6a1
FJ004816(Ko5)
FJ004819(Ko31)
GU480018(India)
KM245130(Saudi)

R6a2
GU480008(India)
JQ704804
KC577359(Mauritius)

R6b
AY713994(India)
JX289095(Myanmar)

Do this presence of Indian mtDNA means that Indians started to arrive in Taron earlier than was presumed?

However, only in the canton of Taron did the efforts to protect the pagan temples grow into a full-scale, though self-consciously hopeless, insurrection. Most of the rebel force was put up by the Armenian-Indian theocratic principality or, more precisely, a warrior temple association founded by the Indian tribes who migrated to Armenia some two centuries earlier, presumably, during the reign of King Tiridates I (63-88 CE).

Tiridates I had ordered them to settle in this strategically important area and supply his army with trained cavalry and infantry, which they did loyally. By the fourth century these Indians had grown to a population of up to 100,000, and they had already been partially assimilated into the Armenian society:

Armenia’s Conversion to Christianity

Friday, June 12, 2015

Bronze Age Armenian ancient DNA - Allentoft 2015

Bronze Age Armenia uniparental data.
 
Sample Name Site Culture 14C Date BP cal BC low yDNA mtDNA
RISE396 Kapan LBA 1192 BC 937 BC
H6b
RISE397 Kapan LBA 1048 BC 855 BC R1b1a2a2 T1a2
RISE407 Norabak LBA 1115 BC 895 BC
H8a
RISE408 Norabak LBA 1209 BC 1009 BC J2b-Z580 I5c
RISE412 Noratus LBA 1193 BC 945 BC
U4c1a
RISE413 Nerquin Getashen MBA 1906 BC 1698 BC R1b-P297 T2c1f
RISE416 Nerquin Getashen MBA 1643 BC 1445 BC E-M84 K1a17a
RISE423 Nerquin Getashen MBA 1402 BC 1211 BC E-M84 T2a

------------ 
Probable descendants of RISE397_Kapan_LBA_Armenia



 
-----------
Modern distribution of R1b-M269

----------
The tree of R1b Hg
-----------
The PCA from Allentoft et al. zoomed